Decorators¶
A Short Reminder
Functions are things that generate values based on input (arguments).
In Python, functions are first-class objects.
This means that you can bind names to them, pass them around, etc., just like other objects.
Because of this fact, you can write functions that take functions as arguments and/or return functions as values:
def substitute(a_function):
def new_function(*args, **kwargs):
return "I'm not that other function"
return new_function
A Definition¶
There are many things you can do with a simple pattern like this one. So many, that we give it a special name:
Decorator
“A decorator is a function that takes a function as an argument and returns a function as a return value.”
That’s nice and all, but why is that useful?
An Example¶
Imagine you are trying to debug a module with a number of functions like this one:
def add(a, b):
return a + b
You want to see when each function is called, with what arguments and with what result. So you rewrite each function as follows:
def add(a, b):
print("Function 'add' called with args: {}, {}".format(a, b) )
result = a + b
print("\tResult --> {}".format(result))
return result
That’s not particularly nice, especially if you have lots of functions in your module.
Now imagine we defined the following, more generic decorator:
def logged_func(func):
def logged(*args, **kwargs):
print("Function {} called".format(func.__name__))
if args:
print("\twith args: {}".format(args))
if kwargs:
print("\twith kwargs: {}".format(kwargs))
result = func(*args, **kwargs)
print("\t Result --> {}".format(result))
return result
return logged
(demo)
We could then make logging versions of our module functions:
logging_add = logged_func(add)
Then, where we want to see the results, we can use the logged version:
In [37]: logging_add(3, 4)
Function 'add' called
with args: (3, 4)
Result --> 7
Out[37]: 7
This is nice, but we have to call the new function wherever we originally had the old one.
It’d be nicer if we could just call the old function and have it log.
Remembering that you can easily rebind symbols in Python using assignment statements leads you to this form:
def logged_func(func):
# implemented above
def add(a, b):
return a + b
add = logged_func(add)
And now you can simply use the code you’ve already written and calls to
add
will be logged:
In [41]: add(3, 4)
Function 'add' called
with args: (3, 4)
Result --> 7
Out[41]: 7
Syntax¶
Rebinding the name of a function to the result of calling a decorator on that function is called decoration.
Because this is so common, Python provides a special operator to perform it
more declaratively: the @
operator
– I told you I’d eventually explain what was going on under the hood with
that wierd @ symbol:
def add(a, b):
return a + b
add = logged_func(add)
@logged_func
def add(a, b):
return a + b
The declarative form (called a decorator expression) is far more common, but both have the identical result, and can be used interchangeably.
(demo)
Callables¶
Our original definition of a decorator was nice and simple, but a tiny bit incomplete.
In reality, decorators can be used with anything that is callable.
Remember from last week, a callable is a function, a method on a class,
or a class that implements the __call__
special method.
So in fact the definition should be updated as follows:
A decorator is a callable that takes a callable as an argument and returns a callable as a return value.
An Example¶
Consider a decorator that would save the results of calling an expensive function with given arguments:
class Memoize:
"""
memoize decorator from avinash.vora
http://avinashv.net/2008/04/python-decorators-syntactic-sugar/
"""
def __init__(self, function): # runs when memoize class is called
self.function = function
self.memoized = {}
def __call__(self, *args): # runs when memoize instance is called
try:
return self.memoized[args]
except KeyError:
self.memoized[args] = self.function(*args)
return self.memoized[args]
Let’s try that out with a potentially expensive function:
In [56]: @Memoize
....: def sum2x(n):
....: return sum(2 * i for i in xrange(n))
....:
In [57]: sum2x(10000000)
Out[57]: 99999990000000
In [58]: sum2x(10000000)
Out[58]: 99999990000000
It’s nice to see that in action, but what if we want to know exactly how much difference it made?
Nested Decorators¶
You can stack decorator expressions. The result is like calling each decorator in order, from bottom to top:
@decorator_two
@decorator_one
def func(x):
pass
# is exactly equal to:
def func(x):
pass
func = decorator_two(decorator_one(func))
Let’s define another decorator that will time how long a given call takes:
import time
def timed_func(func):
def timed(*args, **kwargs):
start = time.time()
result = func(*args, **kwargs)
elapsed = time.time() - start
print("time expired: {}".format(elapsed))
return result
return timed
And now we can use this new decorator stacked along with our memoizing decorator:
In [71]: @timed_func
....: @Memoize
....: def sum2x(n):
....: return sum(2 * i for i in xrange(n))
In [72]: sum2x(10000000)
time expired: 0.997071027756
Out[72]: 99999990000000
In [73]: sum2x(10000000)
time expired: 4.05311584473e-06
Out[73]: 99999990000000
Examples from the Standard Library¶
It’s going to be a lot more common for you to use pre-defined decorators than for you to be writing your own.
We’ve seen a few already:
For example, @staticmethod
and @classmethod
can also be used as simple
callables, without the nifty decorator expression:
# the way we saw last week:
class C(object):
@staticmethod
def add(a, b):
return a + b
Is exactly the same as:
class C(object):
def add(a, b):
return a + b
add = staticmethod(add)
Note that the “def
” binds the name add
, then the next line
rebinds it.
The classmethod()
builtin can do the same thing:
# in declarative style
class C(object):
@classmethod
def from_iterable(cls, seq):
# method body
# in imperative style:
class C(object):
def from_iterable(cls, seq):
# method body
from_iterable = classmethod(from_iterable)
property()¶
Remember the property() built in?
Perhaps most commonly, you’ll see the property()
builtin used this way.
Two weeks ago we saw this code:
class C(object):
def __init__(self):
self._x = None
@property
def x(self):
return self._x
@x.setter
def x(self, value):
self._x = value
@x.deleter
def x(self):
del self._x
But this could also be accomplished like so:
class C(object):
def __init__(self):
self._x = None
def getx(self):
return self._x
def setx(self, value):
self._x = value
def delx(self):
del self._x
x = property(getx, setx, delx,
"I'm the 'x' property.")
Examples/Session10/property_ugly.py
Note that in this case, the decorator object returned by the property decorator itself implements additional decorators as attributes on the returned method object. So you could actually do this:
class C(object):
def __init__(self):
self._x = None
def x(self):
return self._x
x = property(x)
def _set_x(self, value):
self._x = value
x = x.setter(_set_x)
def _del_x(self):
del self._x
x = x.deleter(_del_x)
But that’s getting really ugly!